June 23, 2022

Buffalo mayor calls Supreme Court gun ruling 'disappointing,' and a 'dark day'

WATCH: ‘There are too many guns on the street’: Buffalo mayor on court guns ruling

The Supreme Court's ruling Thursday striking down a New York State law limiting the right to carry a concealed handgun in public is drawing criticism from many in the state, including Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown.

“It is a disappointment and it is a dark day for sensible gun reform in this nation,” Brown told ABC News' Linsey Davis during an interview for ABC News Live Prime.

This ruling comes weeks after 10 African Americans were gunned down on May 14 in a racially motivated mass shooting at a Tops supermarket in Buffalo, New York, and after many other mass shootings in the country. Brown added the ruling would only add to gun violence in the country and be another hurdle for law enforcement.

MORE: Regular shoppers, a retired police officer: Remembering the victims of the Buffalo shooting

“I do see a concern for law enforcement. They will not know who is legally permitted to carry a weapon if there are more weapons being carried in a concealed fashion in the city of Buffalo, and across the state of New York and other communities across the country. It will make the job of law enforcement a lot more difficult," Brown said.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images, FILE
Rep. Elise Stefanik attends a press briefing at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, June 29, 2021.

While Brown is criticizing the ruling, other New York lawmakers are praising the decision.

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling upholds the Constitutional rights of law abiding citizens to keep and bear arms and correctly declares New York’s shameful attempt to shred Second Amendment rights on New Yorkers unconstitutional,” New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik said in a statement shortly after the decision was announced.

Brown called her statement “absolutely wrong.”

“Far too many innocent Americans are losing their lives to gun violence. We don't want to take away the rights of responsible gun owners. We certainly do not want to infringe on the Second Amendment, but it does make sense for there to be sensible gun reform that does not infringe on the rights of responsible gun owners and at the same time keeps average innocent Americans safe from unnecessary gun violence," he said.

Joshua Roberts/Getty Images, FILE
Supporters of gun control hold signs in front of supporters of gun rights during a demonstration by victims of gun violence in front of the Supreme Court as arguments begin in a major case on gun rights in Washington, Nov. 3, 2021.

This ruling also coming on the heels of what could potentially be historical bipartisan gun reform legislation passage in Congress, gaining support from 15 Senate Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

“The timing of this ruling is very difficult, particularly when you have a bipartisan group of United States senators that have advanced sensible gun reform after years of inaction in the Congress,” Brown said.

MORE: Gun safety bill clears Senate filibuster, advances toward final vote

Legislation that was pressed upon after several mass shootings, most recently in Uvalde, Texas, would be the first time in nearly 30 years that Congress has acted on gun reform.

“It took tragedies like the mass shooting, the act of domestic terror that took place in Buffalo on May 14, and other mass shootings since that time to finally get Congress to take some action-- and on the day when we are seeing further movement in Congress on sensible gun reform, this ruling comes down from the United States Supreme Court. It is a disappointment,” Brown said.