A federal appeals court rejected the most direct constitutional challenge to special counsel Robert Mueller’s authority on Tuesday, telling a former associate of Roger Stone he must testify before Mueller because the special counsel was "properly appointed" to his role overseeing the independent investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
The appeal was launched on behalf of Andrew Miller, a former associate of Stone, a political provocateur, and steered by the National Legal and Policy Center, a well-funded conservative legal group with a deep history of mounting legal challenges against left-leaning organizations and Democratic politicians.
(MORE: The conservative DC legal group behind a challenge to Mueller probe)Miller is fighting a special counsel subpoena compelling him to appear before Mueller's federal grand jury, which has been met with heavy legal resistance. In late June, Miller turned over requested documents to prosecutors, but he was also subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury in the Russia probe.
The three judge panel found that Mueller was properly appointed in the spring of 2017 by the then-deputy attorney general of the United States, Rod Rosenstein, after the attorney general at the time Jeff Sessions, recused himself from the Russia investigation.
“Because the Special Counsel is an inferior officer, and the Deputy Attorney General became the head of the Department by virtue of becoming the Acting Attorney General as a result of a vacancy created by the disability of the Attorney General through recusal on the matter, we hold that Miller’s challenge to the appointment of the Special Counsel fails. Accordingly, we affirm the order finding Miller in civil contempt,” D.C. Circuit Court Judges Karen Henderson, Sri Srinivasan and Judith Rogers wrote in an opinion Tuesday.
(MORE: Ex-Roger Stone aide prepared for Supreme Court battle in challenge to Mueller: Lawyer)In upholding the contempt order, the three-judge panel ordered Miller to testify before Mueller's grand jury.
After oral arguments last November, Miller's attorney Paul Kamenar told ABC News, "Even if we lose this [appeals] case we will certainly bring it to the Supreme Court."
Kamenar’s challenge to the legitimacy of the special counsel probe is based on a claim that Mueller’s appointment was not handled properly. He argues Mueller has been effectively operating as a “U.S. Attorney at large,” and as such, should have been appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate – neither of which occurred.
(MORE: Judges side with Mueller, nix Russian joint appeal bid)In a statement to ABC News following the judges’ decision to uphold the contempt order against Miller, Kamenar wrote, "We are disappointed with the decision and will be considering future legal action, whether before the full court of appeals or the Supreme Court.”
Kamenar added, “The fact that the court took over three months to decide this appeal after oral argument compared to the three days it took in December to decide another challenge to a Mueller subpoena issued to an unnamed foreign corporation, demonstrates that this was a serious and substantial challenge.”
Reached by ABC News on Tuesday, special counsel spokesperson Peter Carr declined to comment.
(MORE: What you need to know about the indictment against Roger Stone)Miller, 34, paints houses for a living now but served as an aide to Stone until 2013.
Stone, who was a longtime informal political adviser to President Donald Trump, once described Miller as his “wingman” because he helped manage Stone’s schedule, travel and media appearances, and also provided “some I.T. work.” Miller identifies himself as a libertarian and has said he did not support Trump’s candidacy, but he did accompany Stone to the 2016 Republican National Convention.
On Jan. 25th, Stone was arrested in a pre-dawn FBI raid at his home in Florida and charged with a seven-count indictment in Mueller's probe. On Feb. 1, he pleaded not guilty to the charges.